If I were to summarize the XPress2’s ride quality, I would say that it felt pleasantly (and somewhat unexpectedly) sturdy, adaptable, and well-put together. Let me explain: Lectric’s e-bikes have always offered solid performance, excellent value, and a high degree of affordability—but there was a time that some of the brand’s products felt cheap.
The XPress2 is an excellent reminder of how far Lectric has come. As stated in the intro, the bike’s price has been raised by a small amount, but to justify this increase, almost every aspect of the bike’s ride feel has been improved and refined. It now boasts great components across the board, along with a boatload of features to enhance its functionality and overall ride quality.
Lectric offers a single frame size for both the HS and ST versions; I’ll explain more detail about their differences in feel below, but the recommended height range for both models is 5’2” and 6’4”. I split my ride time between the two models, finding both suitable for my height of 5’11”.
Both models offer 12” of saddle height adjustment, allowing for comfortable and efficient leg extension. The two styles also include soft and supportive ergonomic rubber grips, Lectric’s custom saddle (fine, but somewhat firmer than I personally prefer), and the brand’s custom quick-release (and quickly-installing) pedals.
Our test bikes did not include suspension seatposts, but our contact at Lectric stated that both versions of the XPress2 should have them. As such, our test bikes could feel somewhat bumpy, but consumers should expect a much smoother ride experience.
The HS and ST models differed in their handling, but both weighed the same 72-ish lbs, giving them a planted, solid feel. Their 27.5×2.1” street tires rolled efficiently, providing good traction and stability on paved surfaces, accelerating quickly, and adding some cushion to the ride.
Compared to the original version of the XPress, this second iteration of the bike offers a variety of meaningful upgrades. The Suntour suspension fork felt more robust than those found on many comparably-priced e-bikes, and the jump from Shimano’s 7-speed Tourney drivetrain to its 8-Speed Altus is always appreciated due to the quality of its parts and the crispness of its shifting.
Like other Lectric models, the XPress2 does a great job of balancing a functional set of features with generally straightforward operation. With things like integrated turn signals and a sophisticated settings menu, it offers far more than just the basics, but it didn’t feel overcomplicated or overwhelming to learn—it simply added a couple of extras to what felt like a straightforward bike.
That settings menu is worth diving into in more detail: it’s among Lectric’s most customizable. Riders can quickly switch Classes, acceleration/torque levels, sensor modes, throttle behaviors, and more. While the bike is set up well for new riders out of the box, these options offer more personalization for those who want to tweak the bike’s feel.
Lectric XPress2 HS vs ST Version
As I mentioned above, there are some important differences between the HS and ST versions of the XPress2. With the information below, you should be better able to decide which of the two is the right choice for you.
The step-thru XPress2 is essentially a Dutch-style city cruiser, with a V-shaped frame, curved, relatively narrow handlebars, and an upright riding position. The bike has an 18.5” standover height that makes it easy for riders to get on and off, and, in my experience, the seating posture ensures no back, shoulder, or neck strain. This model fits riders from 5’2” to 6’3”.
It is the more adjustable of the two models, largely due to a quick-adjust stem that allows riders to alter the handlebar height/angle and reach to their preferences. As such, most folks will likely find this the most comfortable XPress2, though others may prefer the HS model’s sharper, more aggressive feel.
The high-step version of the bike has a fairly traditional commuter design, with a diamond frame that requires swinging a leg over the saddle to mount. While its weight balance is comfortable, this model pitches the rider forward, outstretching the arms and putting some body weight on the flat handlebars. It fits those between 5’4” and 6’4”.
This version of the bike features a sporty, more performance-focused feel than the ST. It also has less adjustability, with the seatpost and saddle rails being the primary adjustment points. Any changes to handlebar height or reach would likely require swapping out the non-adjustable threadless stem and/or handlebars.
In terms of handling, the ST model felt more nimble than the HS due to its lighter front end. Impressively, even the ST felt stiff and true when maneuvering, despite its absence of a top tube. The high-step version handled crisply and predictably, though its weight was somewhat more noticeable and forward.
Ultimately, the choice likely will come down to your preferred focus. If you prefer relaxed comfort, the ST will be right up your alley. If you’d rather have a sporty, sharper feel, the HS may be the better choice.
